#Titanic ship movie vs real life full

However, LinesвЂ™ recollection of that conversation was considerably embellished and dramatized for the 1997 film. Bruce Ismay and Captain Smith on the afternoon of Ap(the day before the TitanicвЂ™s encounter with the iceberg). And she did indeed give a deposition at a liability hearing in November 1913 in which she recounted overhearing a conversation between J.

#Titanic ship movie vs real life full

This belief was incorporated into director James CameronвЂ™s 1997 blockbuster film Titanic, via a brief scene in which Ismay, seated at a dining table with Smith, observes to the captain that the ship is not yet running at full speed (as all of its boilers have not yet been lit) and implores Smith that the вЂњthis maiden voyage of the Titanic must make headlinesвЂќ:Д®lizabeth Lindsey Lines was indeed a passenger on the Titanic who (along with her daughter) boarded lifeboat #9 as the ship was sinking and was taken aboard the RMS Carpathia when it arrived on the scene several hours later. Specifically, it has often been claimed that Ismay pressured Captain Smith into running the Titanic at a higher speed than necessary - or safe - in order to generate favorable news coverage for White Star. Smith in ways that made the ultimate fatal collision with an iceberg more likely (if not inevitable).

Although Ismay was nominally just a passenger on the Titanic with no direct say over the shipвЂ™s operations, rumors persist that as the вЂњownerвЂќ of the ship, Ismay interfered with the command authority of Captain Edward J. Bruce Ismay, the chairman and managing director of the White Star Line (which owned and operated the Titanic), on that voyage. If the back of the ship had been raised out of the water at a 45-degree angle, as depicted in Cameron's movie, once the stern tore off, nothing would have stopped it, and the hull pieces would have torn in two.One of the enduring controversies surrounding the tragic sinking of the Titanic on her maiden voyage in 1912 concerns the presence of J. 'But the only scenario I could come up with to explain all of the contradictions was that the ship broke at a very shallow angle.' Close examination of the pieces showed that they had been interrupted in the middle of tearing apart-a sign, Long says, that the ship was still at a low-enough angle (he estimates only 11 degrees) that its stern could regain buoyancy as it began to crack. 'There are a lot of very contradictory things you can see in the pieces,' he says.

It was impossible, he believed, for the ship to have broken up the way experts for two decades believed it did, with the stern rising up to a 45-degree angle before the ship's hull split.

When Roger Long, a naval architect hired to accompany the expedition, began analyzing the edges of the hull pieces, he came to a surprising conclusion. The two divers, whose discovery of a lost German U-boat was chronicled in the book Shadow Divers, say the ship broke up and sank while still relatively flat on the surface-a potential sign of weakness, they believe, that was covered up after the disaster. Titanic's Last Secrets, to be published next month, describes the work of Richie Kohler and John Chatterton, wreck-diving historians who believe two recently discovered pieces of the Titanic's bottom prove the ship's stern never rose high in the air the way many Titanic experts, including Cameron, originally believed. In What Really Sank the Titanic: New Forensic Discoveries, Jennifer Hooper McCarty, a materials scientist at Oregon Health and Science University, and Tim Foecke, a scientist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, make the case that it wasn't the ship's steel that was weak it was the rivets, the all-important metal pins that held the steel hull plates together. In two new books, a group of historians, naval architects, and materials scientists argue that fresh evidence has further unraveled the familiar story of the Titanic, raising more questions about what caused the disaster.

Still, the search for answers about the Titanic didn't end there.